Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizza Haven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pizza Haven

Two completely different restaurants of the same name share the same article, and neither of them are notable. wikipediatrix 18:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:CORP. Sandstein 18:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but modify. Pizza Haven is one of Australia's largest pizza chains, on par with Pizza Hut or Domino's according to these articles (1) (2). The Seattle version isn't notable though. Kirjtc2 19:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rewrite Does seem to be a major chain in Oz. Dlyons493 Talk 19:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- notable pizza franchise in Australia. - Longhair 00:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- there are at least 20 of them in South Australia, they do regular TV ads and mailbox ads. Blnguyen | rant-line 00:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable pizza franchise in Australia. There are 236 articles in an Australia/New Zealand media database so potential for expansion. Has expanded into New Zealand and Southeast Asia as well. The Seattle company doesn't seem as notable but might be worth a passing mortgage. Capitalistroadster 00:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 00:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but modify -- the Australian franchise is notable, as per Kirjtc2's comment Mako 00:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Australian franchise.--cj | talk 06:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Australian chain, maybe even have 2 4 the price of 1. JPD (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Major australian pizza chain with lots of media mentions- the US one is worth a section on the article but not one on it's own - Peripitus (Talk) 11:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable Australian restaurant chain. Cnwb 05:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable Australian franchise. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Definite keep on the Australian franchise chain, not sure about the American chain but it seems to have operated in a large area for quite a while, and the fact that it is bankrupt now does not mean it does not deserve an article. Overall possibly actually a dual renaming to reflect the different geographic areas with dab statements on the top of each article. Ansell 12:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It does apepar to meet WP:CORP for the first use. My vote is to move the current article to Pizza Haven (Australia) and convert the current name to a dab. Besides the second chain listed, there is at least one other in Canada. There could be more. So with a common name a dab would be best in my opinion. The US chain does not appear encylopedic so a brief summary in the dab article would suffice, and that's another reason for the dab at the main name space. Vegaswikian 21:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Split, Keep Australian chain at Pizza Haven; either move Seattle restaurant to Pizza Haven (United States) or delete. -- Chuq 02:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the major Australian pizza chain. Other restaurants by the same name can and should be mentioned, but only in passing as a minor footnote so as to avoid confusion. RFerreira 21:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.