Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizda (chemical)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pizda (chemical)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable chemical compound. All chemical compounds are required to meet WP:GNG to be included in Wikipedia. There only a few primary sources in lower-tier journals mentioning this compound (and the sources are really about a variety of chemical complexes derived from this chemical, rather than about this chemical itself). The only reason this article was created was because it has a funny name in some non-English languages and while this may be titillating to some people, it is not sufficient justification for an encyclopedia article. WP:PROD was removed with the vague statement, "A merge may be a better option", but no target for a merge was suggested, nor do I think there is a suitable one. 71.185.49.96 (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I completed the AfD for the IP. ansh666 23:53, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. By consensus at the Chemistry WikiProject, not every chemical is inherently notable. This chemical does not meet the general notability guideline. ChemNerd (talk) 11:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lacking reliable sources indicating how this chemical is notable.-- danntm ^T _C 18:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A couple of journal articles just ain't enough for notability. Lagrange 613 04:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.