Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PivotX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PivotX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT, I wasn't able to find any reliable independent sources indicating its notability. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I, too, couldn't find any independent RS about this. I'll gladly change my !vote if someone else finds something. Owen× ☎ 01:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above - this fails on a lack of reliable sources. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - adding agreement with above. WP:RS StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.