Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates Vs. Ninjas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, Nakon 01:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pirates Vs. Ninjas

Contested prod for non-notable webcomic that was first created 2 weeks ago. Closest thing to a reliable source provided by the author is a link to a MySpace page. Delete as per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day unless reliable independent sources are provided to demonstrate verifiability. --Allen3 ^talk 17:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable webcomic. JIP | Talk 17:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a bigger rationale than WP:JNN. It only gives the impression that you're using the weight of your status to make the vote count more instead of having a decent explanation. The article should be deleted, but this is very unhelpful. SashaNein (talk) 03:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I retract my delete vote and change it to redirect to Pirates versus Ninjas, because judging by the other comments, that seems to be the sensible thing to do. JIP | Talk 17:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pirates versus Ninjas; the comic has generated about as much independent coverage as you'd expect it to in two weeks, i.e. none. No relevant Ghits, and no hits from a reasonable sample of webcomic-related sites--not even directories. (In the unlikely event that it's kept, the article should be renamed to reflect the fact that the comic's title, for whatever reason, has "vz." rather than "vs.") AnturiaethwrTalk 18:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect per Anturiaethwr. Hard to believe a week old web comic is notable --T-rex 18:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect per Anturiaethwr and T-rex. I am involved in this, although not the artist nor the creator of the article, however even I would delete it. Embarrassing. 86.133.33.143 (talk) 23:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't be deleted as the comic is actually funny, a small wiki article is causing no problem and therefor should stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.171.88 (talk) 23:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect per Anturiaethwr. Seems to be the best option. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.