Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piranha (drink)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Piranha (drink)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 01:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I see no coverage by reliable independent sources. This article has no place on Wikipedia. Bzweebl (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Delete - Not finding significant coverage in reliable sources. Found this article from USA Today, which has some passing mentions: Debate brewing over safety of 'energy drinks', but not significant coverage. If others are able to find significant coverage in reliable sources, this !vote can change. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Similar to Go Fast and XS Energy Drink also up for deletion, another of the zillion elixers created to make a buck. All hatred of magical elixers aside, nothing I found sets this apart from the crowd. Ken Tholke (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.