Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piramal Group
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Piramal Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is spam masquerading as an article. The subject may be notable but this text doesn't do it justice at all. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 09:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 18:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is bad enough that G11 might apply. Tazerdadog (talk) 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reads like a company website. Statements like- Piramal Glass is a global leader in delivering world-class glass packaging solutions for the pharmaceuticals, foods & beverages (F&B) and cosmetics & perfumery (C&P) industries, read like an advertisement. BeckiGreen (talk) 02:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: There is another similar article Piramal Enterprises Ltd Tito☸Dutta 09:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Piramal Enterprises Ltd is one of the subsidiaries/divisions of the Piramal Group. We should look through the entire corporate "family tree" to check for similarly problematic ariticles about subsidiaries/divisions. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.