Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pippa Bartolotti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:BIODEL $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pippa Bartolotti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This nomination is made on behalf of the subject who has been in contact via OTRS. In light of what she considers to be repeated malicious additions to the article she asks that the article be deleted. Nthep (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have mixed feelings about this because she is running for public office, but there isn't much notability there to begin with so I'm okay with Delete. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per request. Can be recreated later if her notability rises to the level of a public figure. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Political leaders can't just remove themself because they get bad press. The article should be semi-protected if vandalism is a problem. Szzuk (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the acknowledged spokesperson of her party and given the extensive coverage, which is not fully reflected in the article at present. she is not only notable, but at the level of a public figure already. Yes, honor her request by protecting article, not deleting it. --Bejnar (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.