Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Ladies (professional wrestling)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Ladies (professional wrestling)

Clearly not notable. Has done nothing in SHIMMER and the rest is utterly non notable. Badly fails WP:N. Second of five nominations that may violate WP:COI !! Justa Punk !! 02:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 04:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Though teaming in a few different promotions, I don't see notability.--WillC 05:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Individually not notable, so as a team they couldn't be either. Mal Case (talk) 06:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete See what I said for the individual people. Mad Dog Dunstan (talk) 03:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. TaintedZebra (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All five of these noms are not just WP:COI candidates, they violate WP:VAIN as well. Rick Doodle (talk) 04:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.