Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PinkType

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pink Triangle Press. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PinkType

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, not reliably sourced as passing WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:GNG. The primary notability claim on offer here is that the organization existed, and the sourcing consists primarily of the self-published newsletters of directly affiliated organizations being cited only to metaverify those direct affiliations. The only source here that's actually fully independent of the organization is a glancing namecheck of its existence on one page of an 875-page historical timeline, which is not enough coverage to singlehandedly get this over the bar all by itself if it's the best we can do. We're not just looking for sources which verify that it existed: we're looking for sources that offer detailed and substantive analysis of its significance, but those are entirely lacking here. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 23:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Pink Triangle Press as the sourcing isn’t sufficient to support a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 10:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.