Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pingus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Pingus[edit]

The result of this debate was ~~delete~~ no consensus, defaulting to keep. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 11:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No assertions of notability, no reliable third-party sources etc etc, fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:OR Delete. The Kinslayer 10:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. The Kinslayer 10:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even the game's site has limited references, mostly articles from German Linux sites dating back to 2000 and 2002. Not enough here to merit an article. Caknuck 16:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. -- Sensenmann 16:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - this game is the first GotM by The Linux Game Tome, which has revamped such games as Tux Racer, Super TuxKart, LinCity and SuperTux. It may not be notable in the general gaming world, but definitely notable in the FOSS community. --vossman 19:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per Vossman. It should be noted that happypenguin.org has an Alexa ranking of ~45,000, which suggests that this game may be more notable than otherwise thought. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 23:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vossman. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it is notable in the FOSS community. Val42 04:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For FOSS reasons stated above. Jdub7 05:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Still fails WP:RS/WP:V. Happypenguin is of questionable notability/reliability itself, and thats the only sources presented. Wickethewok 21:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per Vossman. --Duke of Duchess Street 21:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.