Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ping He (fashion designer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping He (fashion designer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was originally PROD'd by Wcam, appears to have always been a promotional/WP:ADMASK article. While the subject is probably notable enough for an article, I feel the current article needs blowing up and starting over from scratch as from the beginning it appears to have always been a conflict-of-interest piece. The edit history page is fascinating - multiple single-purpose accounts using very similar names, such as creator Luke078 (Ping's husband is called Luke - per this source and the sole source in the earliest verison of the article has a Luke O'Brien commenting to praise the subject - coincidence?) and LO090764); the subtly and not-at-all-conflict-of-interest-sounding PINGHE.Des1gn and PINGHE.Des2gn; and more recently, Aongusjoseph and Angusjosephwilson - I did a bit of poking around and it turns out that someone called Angus Joseph is Creative Assistant for PINGHE... Given that the Proposed Deletion was removed, I am bringing this to AFD. Mabalu (talk) 14:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mabalu (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mabalu and PROD nom. --Wcam (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hardly much convincing general notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per WP:DEL4 in its current state. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.