Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pine pylon

Pine pylon[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge and Redirect to Electricity pylon. Johntex\^talk 01:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Delete as unverifiable term with no source quoted. Google search on "pine pylon" returns only Wiki mirrors. Larousse Dictionary of Science & Technology has no entry, nor does Oxford English Dictionary. In event of verification then move to Wiktionary. Eddie.willers 02:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, especially lack of OED entry. --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 02:25, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also misplaced - why does an article about an electrical device have an architecture stub? - Sensor 02:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom DV8 2XL 02:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge portal pylon, delta pylon, single-level pylon, two-level pylon, three level pylon, ton pylon, pine pylon should all be merged or into a single article rather than deleting a single item in the list. See Electricity pylon
- Comment. I support the idea of a merge into a single article. The original AFD was made as the article seemed to be orphaned in the January 2005 Cleanup List. Eddie.willers 16:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Rogerd 00:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Electricity pylon. Alphax ^τεχ 18:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.