Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot (About a Boy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot (About a Boy)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources, is entirely a plot summary, and has not been added to any categories. IPadPerson (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 23:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article is a PLOT for a TV show that does not indicate that it is notable. - Pmedema (talk) 19:43, 21 April 2014 (UTC) - Keep Changes/additions to the article show that my original argument is no longer valid. - Pmedema (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Lead indicates a large viewership. Cats have been added. FWIW, I have not seen this show. Bearian (talk) 22:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It looks like this episode has been reviewed/covered in multiple reliable sources - [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], which I've added to the article in case these are helpful in creating "Critical reception"/"Production"/"Ratings" sections. Gongshow talk 23:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. About a Boy (TV series)#Episodes. Listing umpteen external review links is just lazy. Add them in prose form or redirect. — Wylie pedia 08:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Now that I've found more time, I have incorporated several sources within the article body. The expansion should, in my view, remove any doubt as to the topic's notability, but if not, I welcome further constructive feedback. Gongshow talk 11:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gongshow has done a good job in adding referenced content and showing notability. I'm not sure that every episode of the show will merit a separate article, but that is irrelevant. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. About as complete as an episode article can be now. — Wylie pedia 12:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.