Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilgrim Song

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pilgrim Song

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability. Possibly also breaches WP:NPOV. TheKaphox T 20:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. There is no obvious problem with verifiability here; see [1] and [2], for example. Nor is there anything in this article that violates the neutral point of view. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rotten Tomatoes lists 5 critic reviews from sources including The New York Times and Village Voice. --Michig (talk) 07:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.