Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pieces (Motor Ace song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:10, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pieces (Motor Ace song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be Wikipedia-notable. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think songs should be able to fall under the A7 criteria, if someone can't bother to provide any indication of significance why should we bother looking for sources for them? They provide one "reference" which is a broken link. This song is about a band that is no longer together, I'm pretty sure their notable singles have already had a long-standing Wikipedia article. NOW, obviously everything I just said has no basis in policy for deletion, it's just my opinion. So to get some policy based justification I did a cursory Google search and could find nothing to indicate that this would pass WP:NALBUMS. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like the single was only released in the UK and could not find evidence it charted there. Found no other sources to indicate how this song is notable. Mattg82 (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm unable to find evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS. Gongshow talk 21:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, would typically be a redirect to the album article, but this is hardly a plausible search term. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.