Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Mellody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pia Mellody[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Potentially passes WP:NAUTHOR but can't find reviews. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 10:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Medicine, and Arizona. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This in Texas Monthly [1] and two book reviews in Publishers Weekly [2]. First isn't enough for GNG or BLP, 2nd isn't enough for AUTHOR. Oaktree b (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maybe the clinic has notability - she does not seem to meet requirements. She is an author and was involved in a semi-public scandal, but does not have significant coverage. Llajwa (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.