Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PiBang Linux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PiBang Linux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software package. Article is self promotion created by the softwares creator. Ridernyc (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn as long as this is taken care of through CSD. Ridernyc (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The CSD was declined so this AfD is back to being "live". - Ahunt (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't meet notability requirements. Sources all affilated with project, not independent as required for establishing notability. Conflict of interest. Yworo (talk) 19:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It appears the software never received any significant third-party coverage as I only found one Linux blog, lffl.org. Considering it was released this month, it may be too soon. SwisterTwister talk 19:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Far too soon for a Wikipedia article on this Linux distro. It lacks any reliable third party references and searches for any turn up just a few self published blogs and open wikis that were apparently edited to specifically to support this Wikipedia article. At the present it fails WP:N as a non-notable Linux distro. In a few years, if the software continues to be developed and it attracts the attention of third party reviewers, then it would be time for a Wikipedia article. Right now, without any independent refs, we have nothing with which to build a Wikipedia article, other than the software developers own opinions to work with. - Ahunt (talk) 19:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOW delete. No news stories found, a web search reveals only promotional materials and unreliable sources; misses WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT by a wide margin. Delete, of course with no prejudice for recreation if it does attract significant coverage in future. --Batard0 (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge any useful content to the Raspberry Pi article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.