Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhytonInc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PhytonInc[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. A Google News search & Google News Archive search for "PhytonInc" produce no hits. A Google News search produces no hits and & a Google News Archive search for "Phyton microcontrollers" produce 4 hits. 3 of the 4 are PR pieces and 1 is a small mention in another product's description. Author claims to be from the "Phyton Team" as seen in the description of the images uploaded by the author File:CP40 and 48.jpg, File:G-41 2.jpg, File:Phyton logo.gif ~~(apparently I don't know how to link files)~~. User Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs) declined the speedy deletion nomination by TreasuryTag (talk · contribs) stating that, "not that easy to make this kind of thing." OlYeller^Talktome 18:37, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There doesn't seem to be notable third-party mentions.SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some important links to the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvector (talk • contribs) 11:29, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of third-party coverage ╟─Treasury Tag►fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale─╢ 17:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, no assertion of notability, and searches didn't pick anything up.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree but apparently, Graeme Bartlett did not. OlYeller^Talktome 19:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tech business that makes device programmers for engineering and volume manufacturing, IDEs, C compilers, assemblers, software debuggers and simulators, in-circuit, JTAG and other on-chip emulators for 8- to 32-bit microcontrollers. Not exactly sure how to parse that list, but the only references are to websites of their customers, and nothing better seems to be out there. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MILL. No evidence of any particular innovation or notable product. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.