Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phugmoche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pretty clear from the source provided that it isn't a village, but a school, so is not granted presumptive notability per WP:GEOLAND, and fails WP:GNG. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phugmoche

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the article itself, the village lies in Solududhkunda municipality, which is the lowest legally recognised administrative division. Solududhkunda is composed/comprised of a number of Village Development Committees, the previously legally recognised lowest level of administration. Phugmoche isn't in that list either. That means it needs to meet WP:GNG which it doesn't. The only source provided is "About" of an eponymous school. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: In the WP:NPP flow chart, does the article contain at least 2 independent reliable sources with significant coverage? No. Claim of significance? No. The following searches: news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR; do not come up with reliable sources. Meets notability criteria for geographic places? No. Not useful at all. Stub article that nobody would search up. It's also a walled garden article. I'll do cleanup on the article if this AfD is ruled keep/no delete. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}^{PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply}(Talk) 05:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.