Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photocasting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mind matrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photocasting

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=photocasting&btnG=Google+Search 500 google hits for a non-notable concept (um, uploading photos to a website anyone?) nn neolojizzum. Timecop 07:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This appears to be a neologism at the moment. The author needs to assert the concepts' notable status. Surely anthing that can be rendered digitally has the potential to be -cast? -- (aeropagitica) 07:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This foocasting rubbish has to stop! Non-notable. Incognito 07:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete User:Timecop seems to be on the warpath against this kind of thing; see his user page. Still, most of his nominations seem to be correct. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - cast this non-notable advertising into /dev/null - Femmina 09:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above... --Depakote 11:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Femmina --Hosterweis 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE per above Tapir
Delete. Agreed, Incognito Jmax- 19:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Eusebeus 20:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with predjudice against the -casting trend. NN-Neologism. Dan 22:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trivial neologism Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with all the other foocasting articles to Podcasting genres and derivatives. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-05 23:01Z

But please let's have a redirect at Listcruft of podcruft :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 08:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Batmanand 08:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Proto t c 10:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP AND NOTE Steve Jobs just announced support for this in iPhoto during his keynote --Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If we have the iPhoto article why to we need this lame ass stub? Delete and redirect is the best option NOT keep. Incognito 17:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP and expand. Photocasting will take off in a big way soon, it's the standardization of photoblog rss feeds, such as those distributed by Flikr, for distribution to devices like pmps and applications which turn the rss feeds into screensavers etc- it is NOT just a facet of iPhoto. This article will become important very soon. This unsigned vote was placed by 88.109.46.177 at 16:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
That's ok - when it does we should have good article on it. Until then I think that wikipedia is WP:NOT a crystal ball. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 21:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP and expand Just realized I was looking at the photocast aricle not photcasting... oh well... I'm a little late to the party and I apparently don't get this moderation process, which appears to be over. :) ...but I assure you photocasting IS about more than iPhoto and it does have a big future. I'm very knowledgeable on the subject and will work on the photocast article when I get a chance. It isn't the worst article I've seen around, in fact it contains a pretty good dose of info to start with. I've been working on the vlog article... and that's actually worse... perhaps BECAUSE it has so much attention. It is getting there though. --mmeiser 11:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.