Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Phoner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT Mfixerer (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, only refs are WP:PRIMARY. Does not seem to meet notability. - Indefensible (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. May need a bit of copy editing. Quick WP:BEFORE shows it seems to pass GNG. Evaluation in journals [1][2]. Some inclusion on lists [3] [4]. Very likely more in German language. —siro χ o 10:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Siroxo. No sign of WP:BEFORE. More than 2 words in the nom. statement could help direct editors evaluating these. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The current sources on the page do not meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria. --Onetimememorial (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onetimememorial I've added the 4 references I found above to the article —siro χ o 20:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - the academic references are okay for barely meeting WP:GNG; neither was cited much. The lists seem irrelevant to me. Suriname0 (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Siroxo. Okoslavia (talk) 06:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Striking delete per Siroxo. - Indefensible (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.