Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix principle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rlevse 14:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC) (delete, delete, redir per anville.Rlevse 14:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix principle[edit]

Also nominated per reason below:

I believe these articles are nearly a speedy deletion under A1, as they contain little context regarding currently established articles, refering to what links here, the pages are interlinked, but do not contain links from other articles (Eigenmode is an exception, due to articles discussing optical signals have linked to this article (until March 19, Eigenmode was a redirect to Normal mode [1]), in which case, I think a revert back to edit 54023351 would be a much better alternative to deletion. In addition, all three article have been tagged with templates such as {{Unreferenced}}, {{context}}, {{OR}} and {{Uncategorized}}, Marc Widdowson has been the sole human editor of all 3 articles. NigelJ ^talk 09:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. No context, original research, no references to speak of. Realkyhick 22:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added further stub material to each article, but there is a real need for an experienced editor to tackle these. I also have not felt sufficiently experienced to attempt the categorisation called for on the page. -- HenriLobineau 14:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Realkyhick. I believe this could have been put under proposed deletions rather than afd. RogueNinja 21:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, although I decided that AfD was the way to go, just to be sure, to be honest, I felt like marking for speedy deletion but I felt it didn't quite meet the criteria. --NigelJ ^talk 22:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete dark age theory and Phoenix principle; restore redirect of eigenmode to normal mode. Anville 21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
d/d/r-r per Anville. This is bellow any standard for pseudoscience articles on WP. Pavel Vozenilek 11:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.