Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phish Food
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article text added to Talk:Ben & Jerry's flavors.. Tan ǀ 39 01:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Phish Food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. Verging on fancruft. No inline cites or references. Unreliable. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete somebody seems to be on a crufty spree, adding nn articles tangential to this band. Mayalld (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just want to point out that this article is almost three years old. — MusicMaker5376 03:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Ben & Jerry's flavors. The charity information seems to be the only thing worth merging. Jim Miller (talk) 14:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ben & Jerry's flavors. No need for separate article.--BelovedFreak 16:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Like An Antelope Out of Control to Ben & Jerry's flavors. The amount of Phish articles up for deletion seems a tad pointy, but this was something that wasn't awful notable in the first place. Wikipedia is not Phish.net. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with exceptions: It seems that many of the articles on Ben & Jerry's flavors have been suggested to be merged. Should this article be merged, I feel they should all be merged. OR that this merger be contingent upon whatever is decided for the remainder of the articles. — MusicMaker5376 03:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the only other B&J's Ice Cream Flavor with an article is Cherry Garcia. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chubby Hubby (Ben & Jerry's flavor) exists, too. — MusicMaker5376 14:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah. Well it wasn't linked in the Ben & Jerry's flavors article. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook
- Chubby Hubby (Ben & Jerry's flavor) exists, too. — MusicMaker5376 14:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the only other B&J's Ice Cream Flavor with an article is Cherry Garcia. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ben & Jerry's flavors. Cherry Garcia is the only flavor that might warrant a separate article; this one doesn't. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why would Cherry Garcia warrant an article and Phish Food not? (Sorry about that horrendous syntax!) — MusicMaker5376 16:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge & Redirect - to Ben & Jerry's flavors. Some other flavors may have stub articles, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a defense for keeping an article. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per everyone else. Besides, anyone who watches The Colbert Report knows the only flavor that really matters is Americone Dream. -Verdatum (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ben & Jerry's flavors - it is not notable enough on its own --T-rex 00:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Ben & Jerry's flavors. Delicious, but not enough for its own article. Jonathunder (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.