Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillippe Camaro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted under CSD G3. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 04:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phillippe Camaro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion template removed multiple times by page creator. Unreferenced, non notable person, ideal speedy deletion candidate, but that process fails with this one. An IP only editor removed the template at one point. Submitting for AfD because that creates a better audit trail of what is happening Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Stupidity. And block this SPA author for submitting fake articles. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is the sort of thing that needs to be nipped in the bud. Because Wikipedia is such a high-profile, heavily trafficked website, articles like these get picked up on search engines and mirrors quickly, and yet they linger long after the source article is deleted from Wikipedia. Before long, the subject of the article will be found all over the internet and people will be quoting it as fact. Get rid of this quickly! •••Life of Riley (T–C) 02:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, hoax. Hairhorn (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete blatant hoax and I have tagged as such. Safiel (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.