Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philkeyz
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Philkeyz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing to suggest that this young man is notable by our standards, fails WP:ARTIST. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: The subject hasn't been discussed in reliable sources. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 14:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Lots of mentions come up with google search, but no dedicated articles, only trivial mentions as per example at WP:GNG. Fails notability. Tapered (talk) 01:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.