Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at major beauty pageants (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines at major beauty pageants[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a list with content that is best covered on other already existing articles. The content refers purely to the results of one nation, and is of little use. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:LISTPURP as a functional information source and navigational aid. This is evidenced by the 57,244 page views the page has received in the last thirty days as of this post. Deletion would force readers to click through many various articles to find the information that is summarized in this article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Does not meet WP:LISTPURP due to it's very limited field of data. It refers to one nation's results only. Due to the article name it is unlikely to be the first article looked at, and therefore has little benefit as a navigational aid. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Keep --I agree with North America. The number of page views shows strong interest from the readers and the information summarizes all the national winners of the Big Four international beauty pageants in the Philippines.--110.55.5.178 (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.