Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Woolfson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Woolfson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable lawyer. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Searches find mentions relative to the firms involving the subject (e.g.[1]) plus occasional commentary items by the subject [2], but I am not finding the specific coverage needed to establish notability. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED - his law firm is notable, but it has over five hundred attorneys. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Also, the article reads like a promotional blurb.TH1980 (talk) 02:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.