Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Williams (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Philip Williams (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Philip Williams (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actor, not properly referenced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, every actor does not automatically get an instant notability freebie just because acting roles have been had -- the notability test is not in the list of roles per se, but in the depth and quality of the sourcing that can be shown to demonstrate the significance of those roles: critical analysis about his performances, evidence that he has won or been nominated for major acting awards, and on and so forth. But the only discernible notability claim here is that roles were had, and the only reference is an IMDb-style directory of voice actors which is not a reliable or notability-assisting source, and that's not enough. Bearcat (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – The Grid (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2021-10 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 00:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.