Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip W. Boesch, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If a redirect is desired it can be WP:BOLDly created. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Philip W. Boesch, Jr.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable lawyer. Article reads like a resume. Don't even see a claim to notability. Only reliable source listed is a news article that appears to have called up for a quote.

News search returns only his Wikipedia article, web search returns nothing of substance. Ridernyc (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Under normal circumstances I'd go for a redirect to Marshall v. Marshall, and put the one reliable source that mentions him in there, but the specific article name here is unlikely to be used as a search term. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. He's a reasonably well-known litigator, and GNews searches for "Philip Boesch"[1] and "Phil Boesch"[2] will turn up a number of hits about Anna Nicole and other prominent cases where he was involved; but all the ones I could see just mention him in passing, or attribute a quote. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One of his cases was notable; the attorney himself is not (WP:NOTINHERITED). TJRC (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.