Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Schmidt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 01:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Schmidt

Philip Schmidt is a staff member, communications director, for congressman Jose E. Serrano. Congressional staffers are not notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. -- Kjkolb 16:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. When he gets his boss's job, we'll give him a page. –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 21:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article was created from the US House shared IP address 143.231.249.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (the same IP that has been getting us in the news recently). Probably autobio. -- Pak aran 23:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, almost certainly autobiographical. Cacophony 00:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity --Ryan Delaney ^talk 11:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vanity. Latinus 20:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment since I already voted. Inclusion of information like pets' names is strong evidence for vanity (that's not something an objective observer would find important about him) -- Pak aran 21:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Know Vandal, Vanity Etc... Fosnez 00:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definetly vanity. Nhandler 04:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not apparently notable enough for inclusion.--Sar e kOfVulcan 07:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unexceptional individual, bio from known vandal IP address (U.S. House of Representatives) - Eric 18:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.