Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Reid (author)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Discussion indicates a keep and improve outcome. No strong arguments for deletion. Added sources demonstrate wide reprinting and quoting as authority in field. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 12:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Philip Reid (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 07:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He has been writing on Irish golf since 1993, has written two books, and is widely quoted by other media outlets. I added a few sources; the page just needs more citations. Yoninah (talk) 10:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but add more sources!RomeEonBmbo (talk) 01:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Delete per the two comments below. RomeEonBmbo (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I removed some of the duplicate links leading to the same article. He is just a sports writer that has written golf articles and a couple of books. It doesn't make him notable. If it did we would have an article for every sports/cookery/DIY journalist. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete irrelevant person. Alex discussion ★ 12:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep on the basis of the NY Times bio. DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not a New York Times 'bio'. It just a few notes about one of their correspondents. They have a page like that for everyone who writes for them. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The NYT clearly considers him a notable golf writer. The correspondent bio was on the occasion of their inviting Reid to be one of just four international golf journalists discussing the Ryder Cup for the IHT.[1][2][3] Sharktopus talk 01:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Additionally he is cited by Associated Press and Irish Emigrant. Meets notability criteria at WP:AUTHOR since he "is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." Norespectasip (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.