Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Nevill Green

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Nevill Green

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written by PNG's assistant. Distinctly lacking in independent references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Agree poorly written before, but revamped. Notable executive who advised David Cameron on corporate responsibility. Sufficient sources meets GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails to have any significant coverage about the subject in third party sources. almost entirely passing mentions or generic listing in directories or affiliated sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- This is a very bad article on a person who is clearly notable, because he had been CEO of a seriues of substantial public companies. The problem is that most of the worthwhile content is in footnote 2. Editing the article should provide soemthing worthwhile. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep as it is now a stub article with sources establishing reliability. Independent references abound in the article, and TomWSulcer substantially revamped it. Novato 123chess456 (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He has just been awarded the CBE in the 2014 Birthday Honours. In the past we have considered this to meet criterion #1 of WP:ANYBIO. -- Necrothesp (talk) 01:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.