Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Long[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have searched and haven't found any sources for this person. The only source listed for the article is admittedly self-published. All the evidence I can find is that Long was a minor player in the American Revolution. Reducing this mess of an article to a stub would not fix these fundamental flaws. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG no SIGCOV in multiple RS, family geneology project created by an SPA. Mztourist (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too many unreferenced statements in this article. As per above, there is no SIGCOV. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly a NN soldier and United Empire Loyalist, whose career differs little from hundreds or even thousands of others. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.