Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Strandwitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Strandwitz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails, WP:Academics. Seems like left academia for industry without spending enough time to develop a notable academic career. And beyond that, there seems to be little else that rises to the level of notability. Hulatam (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hulatam (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He got his PhD in 2016 and has just 7 publications, so this looks very much like resumé-padding for future employment/credibility for his business. He does have a couple papers in Nature with his thesis adviser, but that isn't enough for notability. The microbiome is also a seriously hot field right now, with a lot of journals thirsty for material linking it to every and any disease. Anyway, these are the citation metrics of all 36 of his coauthors and 31 of the authors of the 5 most recent papers citing him (who have more than 3 publications): Total cites: average: 3973, median: 570, Strandwitz: 304. Total publications: avg: 72, med: 33, S: 7. h-index: avg: 19, med: 12, S: 4. Highest citation: avg: 675, med: 109, S: 145. Highest first-author citation: avg: 179, med: 47, S: 145. These are of course skewed way down by the low threshold of 3+ papers, which will include a lot of grad students and techs. JoelleJay (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete a single first author publication in Nat Microbiol. is not enough for WP:Academics. --hroest 16:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. JoelleJay and hroest said it. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to warrant a pass of WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.