Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Nickson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 06:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is clear by WP:BLP1E and WP:MEMORIAL that the topic is not notable for a biographical article. At best, it may be the event that is notable. In the present case, however, I doubt that. The article claims coverage in local newspapers and in Crimewatch UK. But that would apply to hundreds, if not thousands of unsolved murders in the UK; they cannot possibly all be covered on Wikipedia? -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 16:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A man, not otherwise notable, was hit in the head and killed by an unknown person in 1985. That does not make an encyclopedia article. Per WP:NOT "The fact that someone or something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article." Edison 20:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - crimewatch doesn't make it notable. It includes dozens of local crimes in which the police are asking for help that week.--Docg 21:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.