Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Jevons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splashtalk 01:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phil Jevons[edit]
Jevons is probably worth an entry, but this is just an attack (or at the very least opinion), with no actual content ArtVandelay13 18:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep since nominator says the subject is notable. I've cleaned up the article. (There were only 2 words that were non-NPOV. It would have been a lot easier to clean it up than bring the article to AFD.) —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-03 19:35Z
- Merge an article with one line in it? It's better just to mention this on the club article, unless P.J. has done something notable. Atrian 03:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've done a quick expansion job to make it more encyclopedic. Given some of the players who have articles on here, I reckon this one deserves to stay in. Keresaspa 14:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because it's properly factual now so there is no need to delete it as it is a serious article.
- Yeah, Keep now that it's a proper article. Is it normal to vote against oneself...? ArtVandelay13 16:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, Keep changing my vote. Looks good now. Atrian 19:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - Jevons scored four goals the match that Grimsby beat Barnsley 6-1 ! He's a legend in our time ! Andyd 09:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.