Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phichit FC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nja247 08:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Phichit FC[edit]
- Phichit FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article makes no attempt to asset notability and the team are not fully professional. If a minor league baseball player must play at least one fully professional game in order to be notable, why should the rules be any different for footballers. Further to which there are no WP:RS and the information provides no more context than "it's a football club in a league"HJ Mitchell Articulate 11:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC) HJ Mitchell Articulate 11:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - eligible for national cup competition and play in a national level league (see Football in Thailand and Thailand FA Cup) so according to WP:FOOTYN as a club it's notable even if semi-professional -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Blue Square Thing. GiantSnowman 22:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The nominator only gave a reason why individual players for this team shouldn't be considered notable, not why the team itself shouldn't. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Nominator didn't cite any reasons to delete article, but talks about how a player should be deleted. This isn't a player, it's a team. Nfitz (talk) 03:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - no valid reason for deletion given. matt91486 (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.