Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phenom (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phenom (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A typical promotional article. Just the press for startup but not for its significance. other references are merely mentioned nothing notable. need to much more than that to become an encyclopedia notable. This is not a directory for startups happens everyday and even get funded and even get few coverage by popular media. Light2021 (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not convinced getting coverage for a public relations exercise counts as coverage of the company (and if that's the best the author could find, it's even less convincing). WP:BEFORE is difficult because it appears journalists use "phenom" as a short form of "phenomenon" far more than I'd have expected ... I'm willing to be convinced, but frankly even if notable the article would need a rewrite from whatever unexpectedly convincing sources turned up - David Gerard (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly blatant company PR considering the sheer PR notices and republished PR advertising from both the information, sources and the involved accounts, none of which escaped the essences of only mentioning what the company's advertisements would, and therefore the fact my time of watching this article since its start, showed no improvements or any damn signs of actual changes-activities, it shows no one cares about this but making it and keeping as an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 02:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.