Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petrosoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Petrosoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly promotional article. No evidence of meeting WP:NCORP. Of the three sources, two are press releases and one does not mention the subject or verify the claim it's cited to. Has not improved in any of these regards since its creation in 2013. News coverage appears to be press releases, including apparent RSes. I'm willing to be convinced, but ... David Gerard (talk) 13:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article comprising mainly of product feature lists. The given references do not meet WP:RS and my searches are locating nothing beyond routine announcements. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 20:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As with many specialized technology companies, this one just seems to have no been covered in Reliable Sources at all. Their press page is all Self authored and press releases, and page ater page of web results are all directory listings and job postings. Another company that feels like it could be notable but doesn't appear to meet the tests. BoyRD (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NCORP. shoy (reactions) 19:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - little evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.