Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petra Pudova

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Petra Pudova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a speedy/salt request because I don't think this is unambiguous. Google news turns up quite a few articles, but they are in Czech, which I don't read, and I can't tell if they are quality sources. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article itself and the behind-the-scenes discussions involving the SPA-creator suggest this is PROMO. I haven't checked anything on GNews, but the sources in the article are rife with YouTube, Imdb, and Czech websites. This person may be notable, but the article, as it stands should be deleted (TNT). Agricola44 (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds more like an argument for editing with a chainsaw than deletion...----Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.