Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Tuchman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 05:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Tuchman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and promotional concerns. I'm not sure any amount of interviews about him being photographed on the NYSE floor will make him notable; there's certainly several articles of that sort Washington Post, Buzzfeed. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep I think he’s noteworthy, not just because of the numerus articles about him. But rather because his face and photo are somewhat of an institution and probably well recognized by anyone who ever reads anything about the stock market or Wall Street. As the article in the Washington post starts “If you have a pulse and own a stock, you probably have seen Peter Tuchman’s face.”! In fact I created the page because after seeing his photo so many times in articles, I tried researching about him and wondered how come there is no Wikipedia page on a person whose photo is so widely used and recognized. Bloger (talk) 03:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since subject, on the basis of provided sources, comfortably and verifiably meets the criteria for notability. -The Gnome (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the notability is an unorthodox one, but there's plenty of coverage. "Most photographed stock broker" is a sufficient claim of significance to sustain an article, which is supported by sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.