Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Torry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (3 to 1) Wikibofh 23:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Torry[edit]

This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. Keep and expand ambassadors. —Cryptic (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While Torry could certainly deserve a decent article, I can't see a great need, nor can I see anyone much being bothered to write one. May as well delete until someone with a specific interest feels compelled to write an article (unlikely, IMO). --Qirex 12:47, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- WP:DEL seems to say that if it's a "stub (but with potential)", it's a keep. In fact, some might even suggest you take the time to flesh the article out, rather than the time to AfD it. Not me, but some. :) Eaglizard 13:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very short but legitimate stub. -- DS1953 04:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.