Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Roberson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Y (talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#A7. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Roberson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable science teacher, gets the briefest of mentions on the school's website ([1]) and nothing in secondary sources. DoctorKubla (talk) 06:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. 19:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. 19:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 19:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 19:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability not established. See my comment on the talk page wrt authorship claim. --Greenmaven (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.