Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kairoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Kairoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC, no independent showing of notability in music; positive reviews are not themselves notability BennyHillbilly (talk) 08:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent, relibable sources. All of the references are not independent of the subject. -- Luke (Talk) 15:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After all this time at AfD there's still only one independent and reliable-looking review of his music (the "Classics Today" one, copied also in the ArkivMusic link). I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.