Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter J. Deperro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (all delete votes) --JForget 00:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter J. Deperro

Delete. Non-notable subject. No sources at all. Little assertions of notability. Article is written by User:Peter.deperro, so obvious conflict of interest is present. "Peter J. Deperro" gets nine google hits (Most of which are related Wikipedia links) and "Peter Deperro" gets fourteen. Also of note: This article was tagged for notability and being an autobiography, and prodded for being a "nonnotable person; fluff piece." In addition to removing the prod, User:Peter.deperro made a "minor change" that removed the maintenance tags with no explanation why. CyberGhostface (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, virtually no assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 18:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does the army count as a reliable source? [1] I realize it's word for word from there, but it's USGov, so should be acceptable. I leave it to people smarter than I am to figure it out :) LegoTech·(t)·(c) 18:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as the one who prodded the article and reading over it currently, there remains to be seen any assertations of notability. No offense to the author, but, flatly, if you have no claim to fame other than surviving or being decorated in a war, then you chances of having a Wikipedia article are about 0% and holding. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v Mrrph-mph!)} 18:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Note that user Peter.deperro has changed his username to Guardian3a. --Crusio (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references. Nobonobo (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.