Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This has significant underlying UNDUE problems in addition to the concerns expressed below. Daniel (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Hand

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know much about Australian radiojournalism, but I couldn't find a great deal about him and the one provided source for this BLP says that he was fired for uttering a racial slur on the air. This doesn't seem like enough to establish notability and a BLP requires much better references than what's provided. ♟♙ (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Weak References, article has ben tagged for years because of a lack of sources. Tec Tom (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: I agree with the OP's criticisms so I've made significant changes to the page in an attempt to meet WP:GNG, although it's still a weak page. I could only find a couple of sources online, both relating to the successful unfair dismissal claim; and a handful via a ProQuest database search of Australian and New Zealand newspapers (deeper and broader than Google) although most are from a regional newspaper, the Illawarra Mercury. The page now arguably passes WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the article and for adding some references, Cabrils! Still, I am not quite sure, if the page now passes WP:GNG, but would also agree on a weak keep.Tec Tom (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on current content. This article is only two sentences long and says nothing about who the subject has worked for nor when. Hardly anything is stated about his career except for a time when he was suspended and a time when he was fired. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.