Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Filopoulos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (also nomination withdrawn) Canley (talk) 09:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Filopoulos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~BLP of a sports executive doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - notability isn't inherited from the roles he has held. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)~~[reply]

Nomination withdrawn, thanks to the recent improvements to the article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom there is no inherent notability from the roles he has had. This article fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as he fails WP:GNG. WP:NOTINHERITED definitely applies here. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. 99.165.88.9 (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Despite contrary unsupported assertions, clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Assertions of WP:NOTINHERITED are specious. With very little effort I was able to find multiple RSs and have added them to the page. Nom and reviewers: Please be mindful of performing proper WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion. An absence of citations on the page is not a reason to nominate the page for deletion: it's a reason to improve the page and add suitable RSs. Cabrils (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Deus et lex (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Several references were added to the article on 18 June 2022‎ (UTC).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG with the sources now in the article. Alvaldi (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment MrsSnoozyTurtle Even if you withdraw a nomination, it won't close the discussion, as multiple other people have voted deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have removed the notability tag per recent improvements. Segaton (talk) 04:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.