Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Deadman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 07:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Deadman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noteable Rathfelder (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Based on WP:OUTCOMES - "Published authors are kept as notable if they have received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work, or if their work is likely to be very widely read." The book has received numerous reviews and is used widely read. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. seeems promotional. If anyone manages to source it, feel free to ping me to revisit.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the "numerous reviews" revealed with a google search are not reliable and cannot be used for notability.Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not show that they meet either WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.