Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Cvetanovski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 01:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Cvetanovski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that it merits more detailed consideration. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 16:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Borussia Mönchengladbach is a professional team isn't it? The article says he played for their first team, although I haven't time to verify that right now. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 21:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Borussia M'Gladbach is certainly fully pro, but he has only played for the reserves who play in the non-fully pro regionalliga. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think we can exercise some common sense, yes he played one match for Borussia Mönchengladbach in 2009 but that's all, it appears he was dropped. hardly worth keeping an article on the basis of no established top grade career. LibStar (talk) 01:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is where you're wrong. He's had an APPEARANCE for a proffesional team, which basically means it should be kept. I made an article on this player called Sam Magri. It was actually pretty decent but it got deleted. You wanna know why? It got deleted purely because he hasn't made a pro appearance for a team. This guy has. --Wackslas :) (talk) 07:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide sourcing to support this, he would clearly be notable. However the sourced appearances have been for Borussia Mönchengladbach II in the Regionalliga, and for Rockdale City Suns in the NSW Premier league, neither of which is fully pro. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The Fußball-Regionalliga is not a fully professional competition. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.