Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Bevilacqua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. $Salvio giuliano$ 21:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Bevilacqua[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG Simione001 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the coverage in The Age and the Narracan Shire Advocate should be enough to meet GNG here. – Teratix ₵ 01:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it doesn't meet GNG in my opinion. This is just a routine article in a regional newspaper about him signing on to play for country Victoria side Moe. Simione001 (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  The concept of "routine coverage" is meant to disallow brief announcements like local wedding notices and sports scores from contributing to notability, not disallow articles merely because they appear in a regional newspaper. If the extent of the article was "Carlton-listed Peter Bevilacqua transfers from Traralgon to Moe", then I'd agree it wouldn't count. But the article is more extensive, going into detail about how negotiations unfolded, Bevilacqua's ability and approach to negotiation, and the various clubs' reactions.
  
  Coupled with the contemporary coverage in The Age and Bevilacqua's status as the league's only Italian-born player, this is plainly a GNG pass. – Teratix ₵ 04:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Teratix. Besides [1] and the sources Teratix listed above, there is definelty offline coverage of him. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Teratix. Deus et lex (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources on article which show notability. Giant Snowman 10:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG, proper BEFORE not done.--Ortizesp (talk) 09:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable subject with more than enough coverage by reliable independent secondary sources. Article is well sourced. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.